Important topic that attempt to silence the talking. People think that the authorities will protect

The situation today is such that the wireless technology involved uniforme in the development engineers, communications experts, political scientists, designers, and others are interested in only a narrow set of wireless uniforme technology functionality. They fail to fully consider the health of its potentially harmful effects.
If they are trying to suggest that wireless technology is potentially bio-radiation and human health adverse effects, they do not usually agree to review the issue. They are responsible for the Health and Welfare uniforme THL and the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK thing to look into them.
Everything would be okay, if THL and Radiation huolehtisivat in this regard for the health, but it is not. THL has outsourced the health effects of wireless technology research and evaluation in full STUK. STUK, in turn, mainly tutkijoittensa physicist or engineer on the basis of education, as well as the mobile phone industry interests in line with claims that kännykkäsäteilyllä has not been shown to have adverse biological effects. Their training does not give validity to assess the biological and health effects. Physicists or engineers training is not ready to understand what the human body occurs at the cellular and tissue level.
Wireless technology to make the decisions of politicians, who do not have urgent politics of the day in addition to time to determine whether the wireless technology using microwave radiation potentially harmful uniforme effects on your health. They will have to rely in STUK's positions and statements. uniforme STUK maintains uniforme statements in accordance with the rule that no harm is not. It looks like a green light to all in the mobile infrastructure extension.
Last about a year ago in connection with the 4G auction to the Parliament in its opinion, STUK claimed that the new 4G network construction uniforme should not have a significant effect on the radiation exposure of the population, which, incidentally, is not the case. And when STUK says that there is no harm, politicians and other officials believe good.
The situation is unfortunate, because wireless technology is much more biologically harmful effects on our bodies. Finland should get control of electromagnetic radiation to the level that the public is protected wireless technology in a more subtle cellular and tissue-level effects. Current STUK used, outdated science-based limit values, uniforme protect us from just a 6-minute drastic lämpövaikutukselta. These limits are far removed from reality, as we all now exposed to considerable radio frequency 24/7 throughout our lives.
If you have 20 minutes, I recommend this lecture, Dr. Martin Blank, watching it. It serves as a good introduction to the biological effects of mobile phone radiation and the effects, especially DNA. The lecture starts uniforme at about 1:03.
This European Environment Agency does not implement the recommendation Finnish
Important topic that attempt to silence the talking. People think that the authorities will protect them. However, STUK's activities can not withstand closer scrutiny. STUK line with contradictory results, is easy for anybody to find. Stuk is not credible, because the selection and interpretation of the research literature in a manner contrary to the precautionary uniforme principle. Uncertain situation uniforme of fundamental rights and the precautionary principle should prevail over the interests of the business. Also, bring a Comment STUK and your doctor probably largely correct, though the industry claims that STUK also act as RF radiation health effects versed lekureita. How could the check?
I totally agree. Already, common sense says that if more than half of the scientific uniforme studies show that kännykkäsäteilyllä is (harmful) biological uniforme effects of exposure should reduce, not increase, uniforme such as Finland are constantly being made.
It is clear that the government has not been able to secure a healthy environment in which there would be too much of electromagnetic radiation. In addition, for example, forcing people rollout of smart metering for taking indicates that the body's own ability to influence the environmental decision-making is not. I do not think it is intended that the Constitution should be only for decoration, which is not applied in practice.
STUK is the information I received from inside the house, the two doctors. They either do not have any experience, however, uniforme sähköyliherkkyyttä or mobile phone radiation on the study. That is, the expertise is lacking.
Yes, the thing was confirmed: STUK operates two doctors, but they do not have their own research activities or training via familiar with the RF radiation health effects. Non-ionizing radiation monitoring and regulation seems to be firmly in the hands of engineers.
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Act, STUK is to prevent and limit the damaging effects of radiation, as well as to make